A full example report on a fictional supplier, shown exactly as a saved report would look.
Shenzhen BrightPath Trading Co.
Apr 13, 2026 • Alibaba • China • Kitchen accessories
Decision
62
Shenzhen BrightPath Trading Co. looks like a real, active trading company, but the deal is not yet safe to fund at the current terms. The 50% upfront deposit is not conditional on independent inspection, and recent buyer references are still missing. Tighten payment and inspection terms and close the reference gap before sending a deposit.
Score
62 / 100
Flags
3
Blockers
0
Top flags
Most decision-relevant concerns.
Front-loaded payment
A 50% deposit with the balance due before shipment leaves little leverage if the order goes wrong.
Negotiate a smaller deposit or tie the balance payment to an inspection pass.
No PSI payment gate
The final payment is not yet conditional on an independent pre-shipment inspection pass.
Require a third-party inspection and make the balance payment conditional on a pass result.
Reference gap
No recent buyer references were provided, so real-world delivery performance is unverified.
Ask for two to three recent buyer references and confirm at least one directly.
Why this verdict
Business legitimacy, payment safety, and operational readiness are separated so the call stays explainable.
Business legitimacy
Business registration and years in operation are consistent with an established trading company.
Payment safety
Contracting entity and beneficiary match, but the payment structure is not conditional on inspection.
Operational readiness
Lead time and MOQ are typical for the category, but no factory walkthrough has been offered.
Dimensions
Identity & Payment Safety
Weight 25
58
Contracting entity and beneficiary match, but the payment structure is not conditional on inspection.
Recommended evidence
Supplier Legitimacy & Operating History
Weight 20
74
Business registration and years in operation are consistent with an established trading company.
Recommended evidence
Production & Fulfillment Reliability
Weight 15
60
Lead time and MOQ are typical for the category, but no factory walkthrough has been offered.
Recommended evidence
Quality & Compliance Risk
Weight 15
55
Sample specification is not yet clear and no recent buyer references confirm consistent quality.
Recommended evidence
Communication & Transparency
Weight 10
68
Answers have been reasonably clear and no direct inconsistencies were noticed.
Recommended evidence
Commercial Terms & Partnership Risk
Weight 15
56
Pricing is competitive but sits below comparable suppliers, which raises margin and consistency questions.
Recommended evidence
Missing information
Proof and provenance
Generated
Apr 13, 2026 • 08:15 UTC
Source
Alibaba • China
Channel
Amazon
Evidence gaps
3 unresolved
Next actions
Confirm the beneficiary exactly matches the contracting legal entity.
Require third-party pre-shipment inspection before final payment.
Ask for recent buyer references and current compliance documents.
Lock the sample specification in writing before placing the full order.
Case snapshot
Full intake details and observations used for this report.
Platform
Alibaba
Channel
Amazon
Country
China
Category
Kitchen accessories
Payment
50% deposit upfront, 50% before shipment by wire transfer
Observations
Slow replies, refuses video call, strong pricing pressure, no clear references.